Notes from Main Injector/Recycler Group Meeting Monday, 30 December 2002 BCBrown Status of RR -- Stan Pruss leading discussion The available plan for using the dipole correctors has been implemented. On Friday, the DC corrections for orbit local bumps added to the DC correction to put the new desired momentum on the central orbit have been put in to the g(i) tables. The dipole corrections for MI ramp effects have been put into the h(i) table with a correction of 0 at 8 GeV and non-zero values at 120 and 150 Gev locations. This change had been put in previously but taken out. We now expect this to be the permanent change. Plans have been announced for studies of the RR22 transfer line by Gattuso and Marchionni. They will be delayed since Alberto is sick today. Dan Broemmelsiek reported that an anomalous loss of pbars was noted during a TeV Shot Setup. It is not understood. The new vertical Schottky tank showed large hydrocarbon residues on initial vacuum checkout. It is being disassembled and cleaned. Vacuum certification will probably not occur until during the shutdown. The Horizontal Schottky device will be baked soon and is expected to continue through the vacuum certification process. Cons Gattuso -- SDA and related data issues The SDA data for RR pbar shots now looks reasonable. Some plots are now going to the Shots log. One can get some longitudinal information from the MI-SBD information which goes to SDA. Further discussion of longitudinal effects and their measurement during transfers occurred. It was noted that the PBar Source must have longitudinal devices in the transfer lines in order to measured longitudinal beam properties of the transferred bunches because in the Accumulator, the same longitudinal space is occupied by the beam undergoing last turn and the beam in the core. This is not true of the Recycler so we can make measurements on first turn after injection, even when other beam is in the Recycler, since it will be at a different azimuth. There is thus little incentive to add a device to transfer lines to measure the longitudinal beam properties between the Main Injector and the Recycler. There were also extensive discussions of the merits of dedicated (presumably new) software vs. getting what we need from existing or improved SBD software and of the problems with getting results from a console application vs having a dedicated front end application which produces an ACNET parameter. Further clarification will be useful. Chandra Bhat also mentioned issues concerning the use of R87 (WAVERUNNER DISPLAY), R86 (RTD720 FOR RECYELER) and I87 (RTD720 DISPLAY). Additional work is needed to get things set up properly to use these for the measurements he is carrying out.